| Current Path : /compat/linux/proc/68247/root/compat/linux/proc/68247/root/compat/linux/usr/share/doc/readline-5.2/ |
FreeBSD hs32.drive.ne.jp 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE #1: Wed Jan 14 12:18:08 JST 2015 root@hs32.drive.ne.jp:/sys/amd64/compile/hs32 amd64 |
| Current File : //compat/linux/proc/68247/root/compat/linux/proc/68247/root/compat/linux/usr/share/doc/readline-5.2/USAGE |
From rms@gnu.org Thu Jul 22 20:37:55 1999 Flags: 10 Return-Path: rms@gnu.org Received: from arthur.INS.CWRU.Edu (root@arthur.INS.CWRU.Edu [129.22.8.215]) by odin.INS.CWRU.Edu with ESMTP (8.8.6+cwru/CWRU-2.4-ins) id UAA25349; Thu, 22 Jul 1999 20:37:54 -0400 (EDT) (from rms@gnu.org for <chet@odin.INS.CWRU.Edu>) Received: from nike.ins.cwru.edu (root@nike.INS.CWRU.Edu [129.22.8.219]) by arthur.INS.CWRU.Edu with ESMTP (8.8.8+cwru/CWRU-3.6) id UAA05311; Thu, 22 Jul 1999 20:37:51 -0400 (EDT) (from rms@gnu.org for <chet@po.cwru.edu>) Received: from pele.santafe.edu (pele.santafe.edu [192.12.12.119]) by nike.ins.cwru.edu with ESMTP (8.8.7/CWRU-2.5-bsdi) id UAA13350; Thu, 22 Jul 1999 20:37:50 -0400 (EDT) (from rms@gnu.org for <chet@nike.ins.cwru.edu>) Received: from wijiji.santafe.edu (wijiji [192.12.12.5]) by pele.santafe.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA10831 for <chet@nike.ins.cwru.edu>; Thu, 22 Jul 1999 18:37:47 -0600 (MDT) Received: (from rms@localhost) by wijiji.santafe.edu (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) id SAA01089; Thu, 22 Jul 1999 18:37:46 -0600 (MDT) Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 18:37:46 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199907230037.SAA01089@wijiji.santafe.edu> X-Authentication-Warning: wijiji.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@gnu.org using -f From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> To: chet@nike.ins.cwru.edu Subject: Use of Readline Reply-to: rms@gnu.org I think Allbery's suggestion is a good one. So please add this text in a suitable place. Please don't put it in the GPL itself; that should be the same as the GPL everywhere else. Putting it in the README and/or the documentation would be a good idea. ====================================================================== Our position on the use of Readline through a shared-library linking mechanism is that there is no legal difference between shared-library linking and static linking--either kind of linking combines various modules into a single larger work. The conditions for using Readline in a larger work are stated in section 3 of the GNU GPL.