Current Path : /compat/linux/proc/self/root/usr/local/share/doc/check-0.9.6/ |
FreeBSD hs32.drive.ne.jp 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE #1: Wed Jan 14 12:18:08 JST 2015 root@hs32.drive.ne.jp:/sys/amd64/compile/hs32 amd64 |
Current File : //compat/linux/proc/self/root/usr/local/share/doc/check-0.9.6/README |
About Check ----------- Check is a unit testing framework for C. It features a simple interface for defining unit tests, putting little in the way of the developer. Tests are run in a separate address space, so Check can catch both assertion failures and code errors that cause segmentation faults or other signals. The output from unit tests can be used within source code editors and IDEs. See http://check.sourceforge.net/ for more information, including a tutorial. The tutorial is also available as `info check'. Installation ------------ Check has the following dependencies: automake-1.9.6 autoconf-2.59 libtool-1.5.22 pkg-config-0.20 texinfo-4.7 (for documentation) tetex-bin (or any texinfo-compatible TeX installation, for documentation) POSIX sed The versions specified may be higher than those actually needed. First, do $ autoreconf --install in this directory to set everything up. autoreconf calls all of the necessary tools for you, like autoconf, automake, autoheader, etc. If you ever change something during development, run autoreconf again (without --install), and it will perform the minimum set of actions necessary. Then, read the directions in INSTALL if you need more information. Linking against Check --------------------- Check uses variadic macros in check.h, and the strict C90 options for gcc will complain about this. In gcc 4.0 and above you can turn this off explicitly with -Wno-variadic-macros. In a future API it would be nice to eliminate these macros. Debian rationale for not having upstream build packages (.deb files) -------------------------------------------------------------------- For debian, it is highly undesirable if the upstream source contains a debian directory as this one will never be the same as the "official" Debian one, and patching is easier if it's not around. Sometimes upstream insists on having the possibility to build Debian packages themselves, in which case it is best to have a debian directory in the CVS, but not ship it when doing "make dist". Sometimes upstream insists on shipping the debian directory to their users so these can easily build a .deb, which is really bad because they usually don't remmeber to change the Debian changelog and version accordingly, and generally don't know enough about Debian policy to make conforming packages. So in the end you will have different broken packages compiled on various systems floating around which all have the same version number and look like offical packages. -- Robert Lemmen, 2006 The same holds for .rpm packages. The Check maintainer for Fedora Extras, Tom 'spot' Callaway, confirmed that they do not depend on an upstream rpm target in Check.